63 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
|
# How many enbies are there?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
<small>2022-04-28 | [@andrea](/@andrea)</small>
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![A pie chart from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220427/g-b001-eng.htm showing that 48.83% of responders were cis men, 50.83% were cis women, and out of the remaining 0.33%: 27.68% were trans men, 31.30% trans women and 41.02% were nonbinary](/img-local/blog/canadian-census.png)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We're being asked quite often, especially when talking to members of the academia, if we have any estimates
|
|||
|
regarding the number of nonbinary people (either in general, or in Poland in particular).
|
|||
|
Until now, the best numbers we could give them were describing the number of enbies who decided to create a card on our page
|
|||
|
or respond to our [census (Polish)](https://zaimki.pl/spis), etc.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Until now. Behold!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> Canada is the first country to provide census data on transgender and non-binary people.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This week Statistics Canada [published a report](https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220427/dq220427b-eng.htm)
|
|||
|
in which they analyse the results of their census in terms of gender diversity.
|
|||
|
And a TL;DR version is basically this:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- 0.33% of responders were not cis;
|
|||
|
- 0.13% of responders were not binary;
|
|||
|
- the younger the age group, the more trans and nonbinary people were in it;
|
|||
|
- most enbies lived in the largest urban centres.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Which is all hardly any surprise – but it's amazing to finally see some concrete numbers to confirm our veeeery rough estimates!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
However… we can't just take those numbers at face value. The correlation between being nonbinary
|
|||
|
and things like age or place of residence suggests that it's one of those things
|
|||
|
the true extent of which we can only measure once they become normalised,
|
|||
|
once the society gets liberated from the chains of cisnormativity.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
As an analogy, take a look at this graph of left-handedness over time:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![A graph showing a sudden raise in left-handedness between 1910 and 1960 until it stabilised at around 12% after 1960](/img-local/blog/left-handedness.jpeg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It's not like people got spoofed by some evil left-handist propaganda and suddenly started using their hands against their nature.
|
|||
|
Quite the opposite – around the beginning of the 20<sup>th</sup> century the society finally stopped trying to force kids to suppress their left-handedness,
|
|||
|
and it just gradually became a non-issue until it became clear that the number of naturally left-handed people is around 12%.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
We see a similar shift now when it comes to trans issues.
|
|||
|
Younger generations, as well as residents of big cities, tend to be more accepting of queerness,
|
|||
|
which makes it easier to come out or even question your gender in the first place.
|
|||
|
That's why I believe that there is actually way more trans people in the population than 0.33%.
|
|||
|
The more accepting we become as a society,
|
|||
|
the more people will feel free to question, explore, discover and disclose their gender identity.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For the same reason we can't just extrapolate Canadian numbers onto the entirety of the human population.
|
|||
|
With such big differences within Canada, it would be unreasonable to assume the differences between countries aren't just as big.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
But, considering the history of left-handedness, [divorce rates](https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/divorce-rates-lowest-40-years-35587),
|
|||
|
same-sex marriage etc., what makes sense to me is making an assertion that the _real_ number of trans and nonbinary people
|
|||
|
in a post-transphobia society would be _at least_ as high as the highest currently available metric, if not higher.
|
|||
|
Among Canadian 20-24-year-olds 0.85% are not cis and 0.43% are nonbinary.
|
|||
|
Since we're at the beginning of the “left-handedness curve” and at this point the real number is anyone's guess,
|
|||
|
I think it's fair for me to just round it up and say:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> There are reasons to believe that at least 1% of the population is transgender,
|
|||
|
> and at least 0.5% of the population is nonbinary.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Putting that in terms of the population of Poland, for those who had asked us before,
|
|||
|
it's about 377 thousand trans people and about 188 thousand nonbinary people.
|
|||
|
And even if you took the lower ends of the estimates – there's still quite many of us 😉
|