From f2012c53cba9a3053a555ef70357011220aac84a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Avris <andre@avris.it>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:46:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [pl] english - update typics link

---
 locale/pl/config.suml | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/locale/pl/config.suml b/locale/pl/config.suml
index eaa8d2ef..99e15852 100644
--- a/locale/pl/config.suml
+++ b/locale/pl/config.suml
@@ -186,9 +186,9 @@ english:
                 - >
                     The thing is, historically this grammatical gender has only been applied
                     to inanimate objects, pets and kids (in a very limited way).
-                    To apply it for adults sounds dehumanizing for most {https://avris.it/blog/queers-typics=typic} listeners
+                    To apply it for adults sounds dehumanizing for most {https://avris.it/blog/queer-typic=typic} listeners
                     and using the neuter forms of verbs in the 1st and 2nd person
-                    is so rare that {https://avris.it/blog/queers-typics=typic} listeners (falsely) think that it's incorrect.
+                    is so rare that listeners (falsely) think that it's incorrect.
                     Eg. one could say „dziecko zrobił<strong>o</strong>” (=“the kid has done”),
                     but the kid themselves would use the forms corresponding to their assigned gender:
                     „zrobił<strong>em</strong>”/„zrobił<strong>am</strong>” (=“I have done”),